Difference between revisions of "Talk:BFRES (File Format)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Rename Index Groups to Dictionaries: new section) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Would anyone object? They are basically dumped dictionaries. I originally used these terms in my binary templates and it worked out quite well. I don't think "Index Group" is clear in what it's used for; by now (or since some time) we know they're used for fast, named lookups. - [[User:Ray Koopa|Ray Koopa]] ([[User talk:Ray Koopa|talk]]) 09:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC) | Would anyone object? They are basically dumped dictionaries. I originally used these terms in my binary templates and it worked out quite well. I don't think "Index Group" is clear in what it's used for; by now (or since some time) we know they're used for fast, named lookups. - [[User:Ray Koopa|Ray Koopa]] ([[User talk:Ray Koopa|talk]]) 09:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | : I disagree, because they have been known as "Index Group" in the past, both in BFRES and BRRES. Renaming them would just be confusing for a lot of people. And there isn't any problem with the name "Index Group".<br>--[[User:Wexos|Wexos]] ([[User Talk:Wexos|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Wexos|Contribs]]) 09:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:40, 27 May 2017
Rename Index Groups to Dictionaries
Would anyone object? They are basically dumped dictionaries. I originally used these terms in my binary templates and it worked out quite well. I don't think "Index Group" is clear in what it's used for; by now (or since some time) we know they're used for fast, named lookups. - Ray Koopa (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)