Difference between revisions of "Talk:SARC (File Format)"

From MK8
Jump to: navigation, search
(Node Hash: new section)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I'm pretty sure that the value at offset 0x00 in the node structure is a hash of the filename or an ID, because I have found a stripped archive; one in which the SFNT table is empty. The only plausible way to index the files would therefore be to use this value, the values being sorted supports this hypothesis.
 
I'm pretty sure that the value at offset 0x00 in the node structure is a hash of the filename or an ID, because I have found a stripped archive; one in which the SFNT table is empty. The only plausible way to index the files would therefore be to use this value, the values being sorted supports this hypothesis.
 
[[User:Chadderz|Chadderz]] ([[User talk:Chadderz|talk]]) 06:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 
[[User:Chadderz|Chadderz]] ([[User talk:Chadderz|talk]]) 06:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
* That makes much more sense than my "percentage" theory. Then the files would be sorted by this hash. --[[User:Celcodioc|Celcodioc]] ([[User talk:Celcodioc|talk]]) 18:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:35, 20 August 2014

Node Hash

I'm pretty sure that the value at offset 0x00 in the node structure is a hash of the filename or an ID, because I have found a stripped archive; one in which the SFNT table is empty. The only plausible way to index the files would therefore be to use this value, the values being sorted supports this hypothesis. Chadderz (talk) 06:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

  • That makes much more sense than my "percentage" theory. Then the files would be sorted by this hash. --Celcodioc (talk) 18:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)